Rustler Vol. 2 # 9

5 PUBLISHER'S STATEMENT 7 BITS & BITES Crazy, Zany & Bizarre 11 RESTRICTED REVIEWS 17 ADVICE & CONSENT 21 SEX GUIDE Grinding with Gadgets by Paul Brock 23 WORKING LATE A secretary gets ahead by giving it 30 INTERVIEW: Marlene Willoughby The Iron Butterfly by Allen Charles 39 JENNY From finishing school to fuckbooks 44 HOTTEST SHOWS New York's Live Sex Shows by R. Allen Lieder 47DEE DEE Dormitory Diddle Queen 57 JOANNA CASSIDY & JILL ST. JOHN — NUDE! 62 RUSTLER HUMOR 71 3 TITS, CLITS & TWATS An All-Girl Triangle 83 EROTIC ENCOUNTERS Really Close Shave by John M. 87 NAME THE NOOKIE 91 SURROGATE SISTER Big Sister Photos, Little Girl Confessions PUBLISHER'S STATEMENT EVERYBODY'S RIGHTS MATTER Not long ago, the Toronto police morality squad raided a number of so-called "gay" baths. They found, they say, men having sex with each other, a little S&M action and underage boys, including one 14-year-old. They laid two basic kinds of charge: the people owning and/or operating the baths were charged with keeping a common bawdy house; the customers were charged as found-ins. The busts raised a lot of hell. You may remember the newspaper stories. The gay community staged protest marches, one of which erupted into riots. They wrote letters and made angry public statements, saying the raids were politically motivated, that the exposure of some 250 found-ins might well lead to firings, broken marriages and suicides. They said, in effect, "We have a right to live our lives as gay men. Stop harassing us." The anti-gay organizations were equally vociferous. They commended the cops and made general "Hallelujah! Stomp the fuckers!" noises. In all the shouting, one simple but ultimately important fact seems to have been overlooked: the raids and the common bawdy house charges were totally justified under the law. Understand, I am not saying anybody is guilty as charged. I'm just saying that if what was reported in the papers was at all accurate, then there was enough evidence to lay the charges. I don't have the actual law here before me and I haven't time to go looking for it, but I've talked to lawyers and I've followed court cases in the papers. Common bawdy houses boil down to this: places, of any sort, set up and run for on-premises sex. The sex doesn't have to be prostitution, but an entrance fee to the premises strengthens the case. So does inviting the public. So does finding people committing acts of "gross indecency" — a term that covers virtually everything but two people straight-fucking alone in a closed room. The action in the gay baths was close enough to lay charges. And so, almost a year previously, was the action in three straight swingers' clubs. Two out of three clubs lost their cases and their operators were fined or jailed. So, legally, the gays and the straights are being treated equally — and equally means like shit. Remember that the next time your swingers' club gets busted or the next time you cheer on some little bit of homosexual harassment. You and they are in the same boat, and if you believe, like I do, that the law should keep its hands off our bodies, you'll fight for gay sexual liberty as much as for your own. But fight sensibly — don't scream about rights —legally you haven't any! Change the law!